Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Cancer Res Ther ; 19(5): 1126-1130, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37787273

ABSTRACT

Purpose: To assess the treatment response and toxicity profile among two groups of newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) postoperative patients receiving conventional radiotherapy (RT) versus hypofractionated RT with concurrent temozolomide (TMZ) in both. Materials and Methods: A total of 50 patients randomly allotted into two arms (25 in each). Dose received 60 Gy (2 Gy/#) in conventional fractionation RT versus 50 Gy (2.5 Gy/#) in hypofractionated RT with concurrent TMZ 75 mg/m2 orally daily in both arms, respectively. Follow-up was done at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after completion of treatment to evaluate toxicities, treatment response, and progression-free survival (PFS). Results: All patients were well tolerated with treatment; no major adverse effects were monitored in two arms. There was no statistical significant difference in treatment response, which was found 64% versus 60% in arm A and arm B, respectively, at 3 months of follow-up (P = 0.768). Toxicity profiles were also noted similar in both arms. The 6-month PFS was 84% and 80% in arm A and arm B, respectively (P = 0.71) and 12-month PFS was 60% and 52% in arm A and arm B, respectively (P = 0.69). Conclusion: Among the patients followed, this study showed that hypofractionated RT regimen was not inferior to conventional RT regimen.


Subject(s)
Brain Neoplasms , Glioblastoma , Humans , Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating/adverse effects , Brain Neoplasms/therapy , Brain Neoplasms/drug therapy , Chemoradiotherapy/adverse effects , Glioblastoma/therapy , Glioblastoma/drug therapy , Temozolomide/adverse effects
2.
J Cancer Res Ther ; 19(5): 1136-1141, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37787275

ABSTRACT

Objective: The American Brachytherapy (BT) Society recommends that BT must be included as a component of the definitive radiation therapy for cervical carcinoma because recurrences and complications are decreased when BT is used in addition to external beam radiotherapy. The aim of this study is to quantify the interfraction dose variations (VARacts) during high dose rate (HDR) BT, the effect of variation in dose in terms of excess "unrecognized" dose to OAR and to conclude the reason of the variation in reference of applicator position/geometry versus deformation of the organ at risk (OAR) concerned. Materials and Methods: Total 30 patients of carcinoma cervix, biopsy proven, between June 2018 and May 2019, were taken for the study. All patients were treated with external beam radiation therapy to a dose of 50 Gy in 25 fractions over 5 weeks, followed by three fractions of HDR intracavitary brachytherapy (ICBT) (7.5 Gy to point A in each fraction) by two-dimensional (2D) X-ray-based planning. Before treatment in the first and last fraction of BT, computed tomography (CT) scan was done for every patient. Then, a 3D-based planning was performed with CT images on our HDR Plus software with image sequence option. VARact was calculated. Rigid image registration of consecutive fraction images was used for quantification of the hypothetical variation in dose (VARhypo) arising exclusively due to changes in applicator placement and geometry. Results: The mean contoured rectal volumes for the first and third fractions were 41.49 cc and 44.72 cc, respectively, while the respective volumes for bladder were 9.33 cc and 9.35 cc cm. These differences were statistically insignificant (P value: 0.263 and 0.919 for rectum and bladder, respectively). The mean equivalent dose in 2 Gy fraction (EQD2) bladder D2cc was 5.68 Gy and 5.79 Gy in the first and third fraction ICBT, respectively. The mean EQD2 for the rectal D2cc was 11.63 Gy and 12.85 Gy in the first and third fraction ICBT, respectively. None of the patients had an actual cumulative EQD2 more than 90 Gy for bladder, but 36.66% of the patients had a rectal dose exceeding the tolerance (75 Gy). Regression plots showed that VARhypo alone could predict about 42.2% of the VARact in the rectum and 19.2% of the VARact in the bladder. Thus, the remaining variation was due to the organ deformation-related dose variations between the two fractions. Conclusions: There were no statistically significant variations in the volumes or doses of OAR between the two fractions. However, a significant proportion of patients may have a higher dose to the OAR in the third fraction in the absence of individualized planning. This increase is likely to be more detrimental where higher doses per fraction are used. Variations in OAR doses may be caused by organ deformation and/or changes in applicator placement/geometry.


Subject(s)
Brachytherapy , Carcinoma , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms , Female , Humans , Radiotherapy Dosage , Brachytherapy/adverse effects , Brachytherapy/methods , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/pathology , Rectum/pathology , Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted/methods , Carcinoma/etiology
3.
J Cancer Res Ther ; 18(Supplement): S146-S150, 2022 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36510955

ABSTRACT

Objective: Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CTRT) is the standard treatment for patients with unresectable, nonmetastatic Locally advanced squamous cell cancer of head and neck (LASCCHN). The aim of this study to compare the efficacy and toxicity of induction chemotherapy (ICT) followed by CTRT versus standard CTRT alone in patients with LASCCHN. Materials and Methods: Between January 2017 and September 2017, 100 patients with LASCCHN (Stage III and IV) were randomly assigned to two arms: 50 patients in each. Arm A treated by standard CTRT alone (a total 66 Gy in 33fr 2 Gy/# administered daily 5 days/week with 3 weekly inj. cisplatin 100 mg/m2 divided in two days) and Arm B received two cycles of ICT (TPF - inj. paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 on day 1, cisplatin 100 mg/m2 divided in 2 days and inj. 5FU 1 gm/m2 iv d1 and d2 ) followed by same CTRT. Assessment was done weekly during RT and 1, 3, 6, 12, and 18 months posttreatment for treatment response, toxicities, and progression-free survival (PFS). Results: Total response was observed 79.1% and 82.1% in Arm A and Arm B, respectively (P = 0.705) at 6-8 weeks after the completion of treatment. Acute toxicities were significantly higher in ICT arm. The 18 months PFS was 57% versus 55% in Arm A and Arm B, respectively (x2 = 0.039, P = 0.8414). Conclusion: Among the patients followed, this study failed to show benefit of ICT-CTRT over CTRT alone in patients of LASCCHN.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell , Head and Neck Neoplasms , Humans , Induction Chemotherapy/adverse effects , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/pathology , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Head and Neck Neoplasms/drug therapy , Chemoradiotherapy/adverse effects , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/drug therapy , Cisplatin , Fluorouracil
4.
J Cancer Res Ther ; 18(6): 1583-1588, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36412415

ABSTRACT

Purpose: The purpose of the study is to assess the benefits of maintenance chemotherapy (CT) in epithelial ovarian cancer with CT and surgery. The primary and secondary endpoints of the study were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), respectively. Patients and Methods: Three hundred patients with ovarian cancer (registered between January 2012 and December 2013) received 6 cycles of 3 weekly CT (injection paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 + injection carboplatin 6 AUC) and surgery. After 4 weeks of completion of the above treatment, patients were assessed for response with radiological imaging and serum CA125. Then, these patients were randomly allotted in two arms; 150 patients in Arm A received 6 cycles of single agent, 3 weekly injection paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 as maintenance therapy while 150 patients in Arm B, were on observation. The follow-up was done at 1 month, then 3 monthly in the 1st year and 6 monthly in the 2nd year to evaluate PFS and annually up to 5 years for OS. Results: The PFS at 1 and 2 years was 91% and 80% in study arm and 65% and 50% in control arm; the differences were statistically significant (P = 0.010). The 5-year overall survival was 43% versus 38% in study and control arms, respectively (P = 0.410) and 5-year PFS was 28% versus 18% (P = 0.039) in maintenance and observation arm, respectively. Except for peripheral neuropathy, there was no statistically significant difference in toxicities between the two arms. Conclusion: The study suggests that 6 cycles of single-agent paclitaxel maintenance therapy significantly prolongs the duration of PFS and better trends toward OS, though a large study is needed to come to a conclusion.


Subject(s)
Neoplasms, Second Primary , Ovarian Neoplasms , Female , Humans , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial/drug therapy , Drug Administration Schedule , Neoplasms, Second Primary/etiology , Ovarian Neoplasms/drug therapy , Paclitaxel/therapeutic use
5.
J Cancer Res Ther ; 18(4): 1083-1087, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36149164

ABSTRACT

Aim: The aim of the study was to examine tumor control and clinical outcomes of extended field irradiation and compare it with those treated with conventional field in same disease profile and also to determine toxicities associated with radiation treatment. Methods: This study included 50 biopsy-proven and registered International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Stage III cases of carcinoma cervix treated with concurrent computed tomography (injection cisplatin 40 mg/m2 weekly) + external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) upto 50 Gy + high-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy (ICBT) (22.5 Gy). Twenty-five patients were randomized to each arm. Arm A: Conventional field EBRT 50 Gy with concurrent weekly chemotherapy followed by ICBT. Arm B: Extended field EBRT 50 Gy with concurrent weekly chemotherapy followed by ICBT. Results: At 12-month follow-up, 43 patients (86%) had attained CR. Overall, seven patients (14%) were in noncomplete response (CR) group (non-CR = patients with partial response, stable disease, or progressive disease). The non-CR rate was 16% for Arm A and 20% for Arm B. Among seven patients of non-CR group, six had local disease and one had failure at distant site. Five (10%) patients died in this study, 2 (8%) in Arm A and 3 (12%) patients in Arm B. Residual disease was seen in 2 (4%) patients. Grade III diarrhea was seen in eight patients (16%), 3 in Arm A (12%) and 5 in Arm B (20%). Fifteen patients (30%) developed Grade III skin toxicity. Seven patients in Arm A (28%) and 8 patients (32%) in Arm B developed Grade III toxicity. Twenty-five (50%) cases presented with varying stages of vaginal adhesions and stenosis. Conclusion: Majority of patients achieved CR with minimal acute and late toxicities with similar results in both arms. No patient had pelvic or para-aortic metastasis until recent follow-up.


Subject(s)
Brachytherapy , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms , Brachytherapy/adverse effects , Brachytherapy/methods , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/pathology , Cervix Uteri/pathology , Cisplatin/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Neoplasm Staging , Radiotherapy Dosage , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/pathology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...